Randomness -no to Morriss

See my comments as Skeptic Griggsy.

 Necessity rules randomness, which has no purpose to favor any new life form. Necessity rules natural selection, the non-planning, anti- chance agency of Nature, acting as a sieve in evolution

 Theistic evolutionists thus use the superstition called divine intent just as any other animists do as Lamberth's theism= reduced animism argument notes. Theistic evolution thus is just an oxy-moronic obscurantism!

The pre-Socratics are ever right, whilst naturalist Aristotle is ever wrong about teleology. That error and his own science held Europe back in science!

Science doesn’t say that! – Pharyngula

Science doesn’t say that! – Pharyngula

Igtheist Morgan

Igtheist Morgan

Leucippus Updated

Leucippus Updated

Necessity, not superstition, rules

     Those  superstitious  people would think that religious experience can  provide them glimpses of the supernatural prefer their superstition that  the necessity  of natural causes. Yes, some might claim that the supernatural works through  the natural, but that is a useless redundancy.
     The Aquinas- Shelley argument is as Percy  Bysshe Shelley so wisely maintains:" To suppose that some  existence beyond, or above them [ the descriptions-laws - of Naature,M.L.] is to invent a second and superfluous hypothesis to account for what already is accounted for.To  aver that that is a  metaphysical  category mistake begs the question thereof.
       Leucippus would concur then that all religious experience is people's own minds at work. To aver supernatural  input begs the question.
      People cam as  Sacks  maintains self-induce those experiences. Our body chemistry accounts for those experiences.
      Why then would one ever want to be superstitious?   

Thales: January 2013

Thales: January 2013

Necessity and You

   The previous article stresses how to rouse people to act through necessity. Leucippus would add that this should be through Nature, not through the superstitions of the supernatural and the paranormal- what  the recently late Dr. Paul Kurtz calls " The Transcendental Temptation," a must read book.

   Using a greater purpose can help rouse us, but that purpose should never be that of superstition; instead it should be as Peter Singer suggests the eradication of poverty and such.

    Do,  please subscribe to that blog!

     http://nietlamb.blogspot.comDO you have that greater purpose?

  .http://carnedes.blogspot.com

Necessity

Necessity

Hume!: Contingency and Necessity | Atheology

Hume!: Contingency and Necessity | Atheology

Epicurus: Contingency and Necessity | Atheology

Epicurus: Contingency and Necessity | Atheology